WIN Gallery: In Paris, on the banks of the Seine and in the major European capitals, people dance the tango in broad daylight, with no set program, just background music and enthusiasts meeting for the very first time. What is the difference between Argentine tango, French tango and other types of tango?
D.M.: There are several types of tango. Broadly speaking, it is a dance that emerged in the 20th century. Ironically, there is even a tango called Siglo XX (‘20th Century’) which is highly critical of the period in which it was born. We sometimes have a rather strange view of tango; we imagine that it has somehow remained hidden away in the backstreets of Buenos Aires, preserved there, far from the eyes of the world. In reality, things did not happen like that at all. Tango crossed the ocean very quickly, though in a slightly different form than the one we know today. It was a primitive, nascent form, and many of the movements we use now did not even exist back then.
One of the key stops on this dance’s journey was France, where, just as today, the folklore of other peoples was regarded as something exotic. Both the Argentinians who arrived in Paris and the French who were interested in the tango knew how to capitalize on this fascination with the exotic. Schools, steps and codes emerged, and the tango was adopted, reinterpreted and adapted. Even the colour we associate with the tango today took shape, in a way, within this context: traditionally, its colour is orange, not red. It was also in Paris that some of the stories and myths that came to be associated with this dance were developed.
In Europe, however, dance teachers began to produce textbooks and systematize the steps, transforming the tango into a language that could be taught and learnt according to specific rules. Meanwhile, in Argentina, the dance continued on its own path and developed in other directions. At a certain point, the differences between what was happening in Europe and what was happening in South America became very significant. And the phenomenon was not limited to Paris. A lesser-known example is the Finnish tango, a distinct, niche form that has retained certain features of an older, more primitive tango. It probably reached the region via trade routes and the movement of people between European ports, after which it remained, in a sense, isolated and developed in its own way. It is a distinct branch, which still bears the traces of those early forms of the dance.
In Argentina and South America, meanwhile, the tango continued to evolve along its own path. In the 1940s, it underwent extraordinary development, both musically and choreographically. Paradoxically, one of its greatest setbacks came after the Second World War, particularly in the 1960s and 1970s, when the Argentine tango entered a period of decline and came close to disappearing from everyday life.
Consequently, what we see today in various parts of the world are, in a sense, fragments of this dance’s evolution, taken up by other ‘gardeners’, cultivated by other ‘skilful hands’ and in other fertile soils, until they have become distinct forms, each with its own musical preferences and its own language. European tango, for example, often favours older music with a more pronounced rhythm. In contrast, contemporary Argentine tango features much more sophisticated, extraordinarily rich music, sometimes akin to jazz and classical music. The old rhythms, so characteristic of the earliest forms of tango, are now sometimes regarded as outdated.
I believe it is important to understand that tango has never remained a static phenomenon, confined to a single place. It has travelled, been reinterpreted and transformed, and every culture that has adopted it has left its own mark on it. That is precisely why, when we talk about tango, we are in fact talking about several histories that converge, diverge and continue to evolve in parallel.