WIN Gallery: Have the successive collaborations you’ve had with WIN Gallery brought you closer to your fellow contemporary artists? How do you relate to the generation to which you belong, and how do you view the meaning of creation?
Lisandru Neamțu: WIN Gallery is a cultural hub, I might say – where people come together out of joy, for the pleasure of art, and for the sake of art itself. Over time, the gallery has brought together countless lovers of beauty, collectors, and people who appreciate art and recognise its power to transform lives. We are all aware of this: a work of art changes everything around it, provided it is of high quality. And at WIN Gallery, the exhibition series I’ve taken part in have had very interesting themes; Ms Marinela Măntescu-Isac’s curatorial work has been exceptional, and everything has come together beautifully. That’s why I’m delighted to be collaborating with WIN Gallery. But I think what I enjoy most is the dialogue that develops between the artist, the curator, the gallery owner and the public; it’s a unique concept that you’ll rarely find anywhere else.
WIN Gallery: Throughout your career, have you ever been afraid of criticism from the art world?
Lisandru Neamțu: I’ve never been afraid of criticism in the true sense of the word; I knew it had to happen, that it would come naturally. Perhaps I felt a certain curiosity about what the critics would think. Things are seen very differently; eyes are different, and the minds that think and analyse are also different, so why should I be afraid? This variety in the way a work is interpreted is interesting and beautiful in itself. I’ve actually tried to gather the views of different critics, and here’s another thing I’ve tried over the years – at a few solo exhibitions – which was to invite art critics with very different perspectives, so that there would be a variety of voices and perceptions. I haven’t stuck with a single critic for life precisely so as not to conform to a single perspective; so not out of a sense of… instability, shall we say, towards the institution of the critic, but rather out of an interest in novelty. People, as I’ve said before, see things in completely and utterly different and surprising ways.